While photogrammetry, a technology that uses overlapping still photographs to create a richer combined image, has been around since the beginning of photography (and debatably even earlier), in the last decade it has been harnessed by museums and archives to create navigable digital 3 dimensional models. These models allow greater access to many items in collections that rarely reach the museum floor (such as textiles and other decorative items with detailing on all sides) due to being fragile, difficult to display, and other issues. The dynamic nature of these 3D models allows patrons to turn, flip, and zoom in and out on items, providing a more hands-on feel than simply looking at something in a glass case, and an opportunity for closer scrutiny. There are additional benefits to these models, few disadvantages, and exciting future possibilities. I believe that photogrammetry is a realistic, useful, and attainable technology that would prove advantageous for Petaluma Museum. The following report will make my case for its implementation.

link to the pdf

References

Agriesti, H. & Armitage, M. (2019, July 26). Looking from all angles: ArtLens exhibition embraces photogrammetry. Medium.com. https://medium.com/cma-thinker/looking-from-all-angles-artlens-exhibition-embraces-photogrammetry-d2cb75d61735

de Barba, P. & Oliveira, E.A. (2018, December 11). How does learning happen in museums? The University of Melbourne. https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/how-does-learning-happen-in-museums

Dowdall, E. & Norton, M. (2016). Strengthening networks, sparking change: Museums and libraries as community catalysts. Institute of Museum and Library Services. https://www.imls.gov/sites/default/files/publications/documents/community-catalyst-report-january-2017.pdf

Echavarria, K. & Samaroudi, M. (2019, December 3). 3D printing is helping museums in repatriation and decolonisation efforts. The Conversation.com. https://theconversation.com/3d-printing-is-helping-museums-in-repatriation-and-decolonisation-efforts-126449

Factum Foundation (n.d.). Photogrammetry. https://www.factumfoundation.org/pag_fa/1345/photogrammetry

Knight Foundation. (2017, May 18). 12 art museums to engage audiences with new technologies with $1.87 million from Knight Foundation. https://knightfoundation.org/press/releases/12-art-museums-to-engage-audiences-with-new-technologies-with-1-87-million-from-knight-foundation/

Shao, X. (2018, November 5). Photogrammetry 01: a brief history -1840 ’til now. AR Eye. http://www.ar-eye.com/2018/11/05/photogrammetry-01-a-brief-history/

Simon, N. (2010). The participatory museum. Nina Simon.

Simplify 3D (2019, May 9). Restoring Museum Relics with 3D Printing. https://www.simplify3d.com/restoring-museum-relics-with-3d-printing/

Smithsonian(n.d.). 3D technologies: Photogrammetry.

https://www.si.edu/MCIImagingStudio/3DTechnologies Woody, R. (2018, September 5). 3D digitization in the museum-part 1: photogrammetry. Lucidea. https://blog.lucidea.com/3d-digitization-in-the-museum-part-1?hs_amp=false

Categories: Uncategorized

1 Comment

Emrys Holmes · May 10, 2021 at 7:38 pm

This is an awesome idea!! I’m super into digital conservation so I love this concept, and you’ve gotten me really interested in photogrammetry now. Thanks for all the info, and I hope you’re able to submit this or a proposal like it at some point in the future!

Comments are closed.